
Intelligent Design
What is Intelligent Design:
From
Discovery.org
"The theory of intelligent design holds that
certain features of the universe and of living things are best
explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as
natural selection."
Intelligent Design claims that intelligence can also be detected in
biological designs, such as the
flagellar motor. They compare this looking at Mt. Rushmore and recognizing that
it didn't happen by natural processes, but was the work of intelligence.
Does this mean every time someone sees the Virgin Mary in a piece of cheese
toast, an intelligent agent intervened?
'Virgin Mary'
toast fetches $28,000
Contents:
Michael Behe on the Age of the Universe and Evolution:
One of the common misconceptions about Intelligent Design is that it
disproves evolution. This simply isn't true. While it does claim
that SOME parts of evolution, particularly at the cell level, are wrong, it
supports evolution in general. Behe writes:
- For the record, I have no reason to doubt that the universe is
the billions of years old that physicists say it is. Further, I find
the idea of common descent (that all organisms share a common
ancestor) fairly convincing, and have no particular reason to doubt
it. I greatly respect the work of my colleagues who study the
development and behavior of organisms within an evolutionary
framework, and I think that evolutionary biologists have contributed
enormously to our understanding of the world. Although Darwin's
mechanism--natural selection working on variation--might explain
many things, however, I do not believe it explains molecular life.
(Darwin's Black Box
:
The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution p. 5)
I clearly write in my book
Darwin's Black Box
that I am not a creationist and have no reason to doubt common
descent. In fact, my own views fit quite comfortably with the
40% of scientists that Scott acknowledges think evolution occurred,
but was guided by God.*
Does Intelligent Design require a
supernatural designer?
William Dembski believes that the
intelligent agent behind Intelligent Design must be non-physical, i.e.
supernatural. From
The Act of
Creation: Bridging Transcendence and Immanence, by Dembski:
"Moreover, it is a transcendent design, not reducible to the physical
world. Indeed, no intelligent agent who is strictly physical could have
presided over the origin of the universe or the origin of life."
Intelligent Design and God The
Discovery Institute's (the primary promoter of ID) plan to use Intelligent
Design to promote Christianity is spelled out in their
Wedge Strategy
"…which has come to be called the theory of intelligent
design (ID). Design theory promises to reverse the stifling dominance of the
materialist worldview, and to replace it with a science consonant with
Christian and theistic convictions."
William Dembski cites the Bible's Book of
John as the foundation of intelligent design. Dembski in Touchstone
Magazine. Volume 12, Issue4. July/August, 1999:
"Intelligent design is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel restated
in the idiom of information theory."
William Dembski states in
A Reply to Henry Morris that
"ID is part of God's general revelation," and "I've found that it opens
the path for people to come to Christ."
Reviews of Intelligent Design Videos
The next question is, what or who is the intelligent agent?
William Dembski states that the universe displays
features of having been designed, and concludes that
"no intelligent agent who is strictly physical
could have presided over the origin of the universe or the origin of
life."
This clearly states that the intelligent agent is
a non-physical, thus, by definition, supernatural.
Why Won't Scientists Debate Intelligent Design?
Intelligent Design View
Intelligent Design is a valid alternate theory to evolution and should be
openly debated. What are the evolutionists afraid of? Are their
theories so fragile that they won't hold up in a debate?
Evolutionist View
For the same reason that we don't debate flat earth proponents such as the
Flat Earth Society. If the IDers will do some real research and have it
peer reviewed so that they elevate their views to the level of science, then we
will debate them. But simply saying that evolution doesn't have all the
answers and therefore there must be an intelligent designer is not science.
Opinions from Others
List of Peer-Reviewed Intelligent Design Articles
Do we live on a planet that
was
specially created for life?
Are these claims valid or
pseudoscientific nonsense?
These claims and others are
explored in the
"The
Privileged Planet"
|
Other Information
|